Forty years ago next week marked a historic point in Soviet-American relations. On May 22, 1972, President Richard Nixon landed in Moscow for an unprecedented week-long summit with Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev, Premier Alexei Kosygin and other Soviet officials that culminated in the SALT I Treaty and marked the height of the détente era.
In honor of this four decade anniversary, I thought I’d write about an insightful publication by the State Department entitled “Soviet-American Relations: The Détente Years, 1969-1972” that covers this important period that marked a détente or a “thawing” of Cold War relations between the two superpowers.
Extremely interesting are the forewords by both Nixon’s Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin. In them, they talk about their personal relationship that forged “The Channel” of communications between the two governments that finally led to the breakthrough in negotiations.
Kissinger reminisces:
On March 25, 1971, according to the transcript of a telephone conversation with Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin, I remarked: “When we are both out of government service, which will be a lot later for you than for me, I hope you will let me read the reports you send in on me.” … My remark to Dobrynin was an interlude in what evolved into almost daily exchanges. What was later named “The Channel” began as a general exchange of views. Starting in 1971, the Channel became the principal venue for U.S.-Soviet relations.
Don’t change “The Channel”
According to Kissinger in “The Détente Years”, “The Channel” became one of the pathways of change, and “produced a number of significant agreements”, including:
- an agreed approach on Strategic Arms Limitation (May 1971);
- the conclusion of an agreement regarding access to Berlin (September 1971);
- the announcement of a Soviet-American summit agreement (October 1971); and
- President Nixon’s visit to Moscow (May 1972), at which agreements, the most important of which were a treaty regulating Ballistic Missile Defense and a five-year freeze on deploying additional offensive strategic weapons, were concluded. The two sides also published an agreed statement on principles of international conduct.
Image: Nixon and Brezhnev shake after signing the SALT treaty on May 26, 1972 (Source: Corbis Images).
Pass the SALT, please
The highlight of the publication is the discussion about the lead-up and issues during the Moscow Summit and the final negotiations of the SALT I Treaty.
SALT I, the first series of Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, had begun in November 1969 to explore ways to halt or reduce the arms race, particularly nuclear weapon proliferation. This week of meetings from May 22 to 26, was set up after those years of negotiations to finalize and sign a number of agreements that increased cooperation and reduced the mutual nuclear threat between the two nations.
Image: Nuclear Limits. (Source: Time Magazine, 1972)
On May 26, Nixon and Brezhnev signed the Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I), the most significant of the multiple agreements reached during the Moscow summit. The terms of the SALT treaty limited the USSR and the United States to only 200 anti-ballistic missiles each, which had to be split between two defensive systems.
One good (hand)shake leads to another
Among all the handshakes at this Moscow summit was another for the “Agreement between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Cooperation in the Fields of Science and Technology” which laid the groundwork for the first joint Soviet-US space flight. Called the Apollo Soyuz Test Project or ASTP, the ASTP flight lasted only nine days from July 15-24, 1975, but led to another famous handshake… this time in space.
Image: Photo of the famous handshake between Astronaut Thomas P. Stafford (f.g.) and cosmonaut Aleksei A. Leonov after a successful linkup in space of the Americans’ Apollo and the Soviets’ Soyuz spacecrafts on July 17, 1975 (Source: NASA ASTP gallery).
Innovation = Bureaucratic dismay
All in all, this publication provides unique insights from the players involved about the diplomatic communications and procedural changes and innovations that were put in place on both sides to eliminate the logjam in relations between Soviets and American administrations since the end of World War II. And sometimes these changes were done “outside” the normal processes.
As Kissinger explains in the book:
Paradoxically, the Channel worked best so long as the bureaucracy did not know of its existence. While that was the case, the participants in the interdepartmental machinery had an incentive to adjust their positions toward what they thought was feasible; in general, no one wanted to assume responsibility for failure by inflexibility…
For all the bureaucratic dismay it caused, the Channel was an innovative attempt to transcend the formalities of an increasingly bureaucratized diplomacy. It helped contain crises, saw America through a period of domestic divisions and sketched prospects for a more peaceful world.
HOW DO I OBTAIN “Soviet-American Relations: The Détente Years, 1969-1972”?
- Buy it online 24/7 at GPO’s Online Bookstore.
- Buy it at GPO’s retail bookstore at 710 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, DC 20401, open Monday-Friday, 9am to 4pm, except Federal holidays, (202) 512-0132.
- Find it in a library.
About the Author: Michele Bartram is Promotions Manager for GPO’s Publication and Information Sales Division and is responsible for online and offline marketing of the US Government Online Bookstore (Bookstore.gpo.gov) and promoting Federal government content to the public.
govbooktalk
Trudy Hawkins
Government Book Talk 
Hi there,
Firstly, a bunch of thanks for sharing such amazing information with us. Actually I was doing some research about SALT I Treaty 1978. and I get landed over your article, it was to informative.
Thank you
Source: https://myeveschoice.com/
LikeLike
Glad we were able to help with your research.
LikeLike
Such a valuable internet log…wow !!!!
LikeLike
What an interesting article about the relationship between the Soviet Union and America. There is new information that I would not have known if not for this article. The pictures you used are very relevant and seem new.
LikeLike
It’s truly a nice and useful piece of information. I’m glad that you simply shared this helpful info with us. Please keep us up to date like this. Thanks for sharing.
LikeLike
When I originally commented I clicked the “Notify me when new comments are added” checkbox and now each time a comment is added I get four e-mails with the same comment. Is there any way you are able to remove people from that service? A lot of thanks!
LikeLike
Thersa:
So sorry you’re having problems. It seems to be the week for WordPress issues! This is definitely one of WordPress’ little quirks… To unsubscribe from receiving emails about a particular comment, look for the link at the bottom of the WordPress email you receive about the comment that says: “Want less email? Modify your Subscription Options.” Click on the “Subscription Options” link and then unsubscribe to a particular comment. I tried it out and it works, but I agree with you WordPress’ usability could use some improvement!
According to WordPress’ Comments tutorial this plugin called Subscribe to Comments is “one of the most popular WordPress plugins out there” and “allows commentators on your blog to check a box before commenting and get e-mail notification of further comments.” WordPress goes on to say:
I hope this helps! And don’t let this discourage you from commenting… We enjoy hearing from you!
LikeLike
I think this is among the most significant information for me. And i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things, The website style is perfect, the articles is really excellent : D. Good job, cheers
LikeLike
Como convencer al mundo diciendo..iran tiene planeado hacer armas nucleares’ me parece una falacia usa tiene muchas , rusia tambien israel tiene mas que gran bretaña, y suficiente tuvimos por el mururoa, y ahora que? algunos no ven los acuerdos de ese modo , lo ven como el renacimiento de las cruzadas, donde todos nosotros somos los cruzados y mi pais no tiene ninguna arma digo nuclear en el aspecto de destruccion masiva, ya que el uranio se usa hace tiempo en armas ” convencionales”… hace mucho tiempo” tanto de aqui como de alla, fijense A/A misiles . deben meditar argumentos mas convincentes, no para mi , para el resto, yo se que pensar, es solo por los origenes del convencimiento mismo.
LikeLike
Gracias por su comentario.
LikeLike